![]() ![]() 3 This was particularly disheartening because the 20 UN GGE reports had made significant progress with respect to articulating both binding and hortatory norms applicable in cyberspace. 2 Opposition from a number of states, most notably China and Russia, to any explicit mention of either the law of self-defense or international humanitarian law, as well as a degree of resistance to text that would implicate the right of states to take countermeasures (discussed below) pursuant to the law of state responsibility, prevented issuance of a consensus report by the group of 25 states. Of particular note is the failure of the 2016 – 2017 UN Group of Governmental Experts (GGE) to agree on text regarding cyber norms for inclusion in the report it had expected to issue. ![]() Recent events have proven rather discouraging with respect to the recognition and further development of a normative architecture to govern operations in cyberspace. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |